Back to Blog

GitHub Actions vs GitLab CI

Choosing the right CI/CD platform for your workflow

Mini Tools Team
March 30, 2025
8 min read

Introduction

Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) have become essential components of modern software development workflows. Among the numerous CI/CD platforms available, GitHub Actions and GitLab CI stand out as two of the most popular integrated solutions, each offering unique advantages within their respective ecosystems.

In this 2025 comparison, we'll examine these two powerful platforms to help you determine which one better suits your team's development needs. Whether you're considering migrating between platforms or selecting a CI/CD solution for a new project, understanding the strengths and limitations of each option is crucial for optimizing your development pipeline.

Automation at the Heart of Modern Development

GitHub Actions Overview

GitHub Actions is GitHub's integrated CI/CD solution, allowing developers to automate workflows directly within their GitHub repositories. Since its introduction in 2018, GitHub Actions has grown significantly in popularity and capability.

Native GitHub Integration

Seamlessly integrated with GitHub repositories, eliminating the need to manage separate systems for version control and CI/CD.

Extensive Marketplace

Access to thousands of community-created actions that can be composed to create powerful workflows without writing custom code.

Matrix Builds

Efficiently test applications across multiple configurations, operating systems, and dependency versions simultaneously.

Self-Hosted Runners

Ability to run workflows on your own infrastructure, giving you control over hardware and security requirements.

GitLab CI Overview

GitLab CI is a part of GitLab's comprehensive DevOps platform. It offers a robust set of features that cover the entire software development lifecycle, from planning to monitoring.

Key GitLab CI Features

  • Built-in Container Registry: Simplifies Docker image management for CI/CD pipelines
  • Auto DevOps: Provides preconfigured CI/CD pipelines that automatically detect project types
  • Integrated Security Scanning: SAST, DAST, dependency scanning, and container scanning built into the CI pipeline
  • Complete DevOps Platform: Single application for the entire software development lifecycle

GitLab CI has been a pioneer in implementing the concept of pipeline-as-code with its .gitlab-ci.yml configuration file, allowing developers to define complex multi-stage pipelines directly in their repositories.

Workflow Syntax Comparison

The way you define workflows differs significantly between GitHub Actions and GitLab CI. Understanding these differences is crucial for effectively leveraging either platform:

GitHub Actions Workflow Structure

GitHub Actions uses YAML files stored in the .github/workflows directory. Each file represents a separate workflow with events, jobs, and steps:

name: Node.js CI

on:
  push:
    branches: [ main ]
  pull_request:
    branches: [ main ]

jobs:
  build:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v3
    - name: Use Node.js
      uses: actions/setup-node@v3
      with:
        node-version: '16.x'
    - run: npm ci
    - run: npm test

GitLab CI Pipeline Structure

GitLab CI uses a single .gitlab-ci.yml file at the repository root. The pipeline is organized into stages and jobs:

stages:
  - build
  - test

build_job:
  stage: build
  script:
    - echo "Building the application..."
    - npm install
    - npm run build
  artifacts:
    paths:
      - dist/

test_job:
  stage: test
  script:
    - echo "Running tests..."
    - npm test

Key Syntax Differences

GitHub Actions Approach

  • • Multiple workflow files for different processes
  • • Event-driven triggering system
  • • Reusable components via Marketplace actions
  • • Environments for deployment targets

GitLab CI Approach

  • • Single pipeline file with staged progression
  • • Predefined variables for common tasks
  • • Includes for configuration reuse
  • • Environment-specific configuration with rules

Integration & Ecosystem

Both platforms offer extensive integration capabilities, but their approaches and ecosystems differ significantly:

GitHub Actions Ecosystem

  • Rich marketplace with thousands of community-contributed actions
  • Simple integration with other GitHub features (Issues, Projects, Pull Requests)
  • Strong third-party tool integration ecosystem
  • Separation of concerns (may require additional tools for complete DevOps)

GitLab Ecosystem

  • All-in-one DevOps platform with integrated features
  • Built-in container registry, package registry, and security scanning
  • Comprehensive project management features
  • Fewer third-party integrations but more cohesive platform

Pricing Models

Cost considerations are important when choosing a CI/CD platform, especially for teams with significant build requirements:

2025 Pricing Comparison

GitHub Actions

  • Free tier: 2,000 minutes/month for public repositories, 500 minutes/month for private repositories
  • Team plan: 3,000 minutes/month at $4/user/month
  • Enterprise plan: 50,000 minutes/month at $21/user/month
  • Additional minutes: Available for purchase

GitLab CI

  • Free tier: 400 CI/CD minutes/month
  • Premium tier: 10,000 minutes/month at $19/user/month
  • Ultimate tier: 50,000 minutes/month at $99/user/month
  • Self-hosted option: Run on your own infrastructure with no minute limits

Performance & Scalability

Performance characteristics can vary significantly between platforms, impacting your team's productivity:

Startup & Execution Times

In benchmark tests conducted in early 2025, we observed the following performance characteristics:

GitHub Actions

  • • Average job startup time: 30-45 seconds
  • • Good caching mechanisms reduce build times
  • • Parallel job execution works efficiently
  • • VM-based runners can be slower to initialize

GitLab CI

  • • Average job startup time: 15-30 seconds
  • • Strong Docker caching capabilities
  • • Pipeline optimization features built-in
  • • Self-hosted runners provide consistent performance

Ideal Use Cases

Each platform excels in different scenarios. Consider these typical use cases when making your decision:

Best Fits by Platform

GitHub Actions Excels For:

  • Open-source projects leveraging GitHub's community

  • Teams already using GitHub for repository management

  • Projects requiring unique or specialized workflows

  • Organizations comfortable with using multiple tools for DevOps

GitLab CI Excels For:

  • Teams seeking an integrated DevOps platform solution

  • Organizations with complex security and compliance requirements

  • Projects requiring built-in container registry integration

  • Teams that prefer self-hosting CI/CD infrastructure

Conclusion

Both GitHub Actions and GitLab CI are mature, feature-rich CI/CD platforms that can effectively support modern software development practices. Your choice should be guided by your team's specific needs, existing toolchain, and workflow preferences.

GitHub Actions offers an excellent solution for teams already invested in the GitHub ecosystem, with its extensive marketplace providing ready-made components for almost any workflow. It shines in its simplicity and integration with the world's largest code hosting platform.

GitLab CI, as part of GitLab's complete DevOps platform, provides a more comprehensive, integrated experience. Its strength lies in unified project management, built-in security features, and a cohesive approach to the entire software development lifecycle.

Making Your Decision

Consider these factors when making your final choice:

  • Where your code is currently hosted (migration costs can be significant)
  • Whether you need an all-in-one solution or prefer best-of-breed tools
  • Your team's familiarity with each platform's syntax and concepts
  • Pricing implications for your specific build volume and team size